# Minor-Embedding a Problem¶

The D-Wave QPU minimizes the energy of an Ising spin configuration
whose pairwise interactions lie on the edges of either a Chimera graph or a
Pegasus graph, for the D-Wave 2000Q or Advantage respectively. To solve an Ising
spin problem with arbitrary pairwise interaction structure, the corresponding graph
must be *minor embedded* into a QPU’s graph.

Similar to Lagrangian relaxation, you map a given problem’s variable \(s_i\) onto a set of qubits \(\{q_i^{(1)}, \cdots, q_i^{(k)}\}\) while encoding equality constraint \(q_i^{(j)} = q_i^{(j')}\) as an Ising penalty \(-M q_i^{(j)} q_i^{(j')}\) of weight \(M>0\).

The Background chapter provides several introductory examples of embeddings.

There are algorithms that can embed a problem of \(N\) variables in at most \(N^2\) qubits.

## General Considerations¶

The following considerations apply to minor embedding.

*Global embedding*models each constraint as an Ising model, adds all constraint models, and maps the aggregate onto the QPU graph. Advantages of this method are that it typically requires fewer qubits and shorter chains of connected qubits for logical problem variables.*Locally structured embedding*models each constraint locally within a subgraph, places the local subgraphs within the QPU graph, and then connects variables belonging to multiple local subgraphs. Advantages of this method, when the scopes of constraints are small, are typically that it is more scalable to large problems, requires less precision for parameters, and enforces qubit chains with lower coupling strengths.- When mapping a problem’s variable to qubits chains, the penalties for equality constraints should be (1) large enough so low-energy configurations do not violate these constraints and (2) the smallest weight that enforces the constraints while enabling precise problem statement (on \(\vc{h}\) and \(\vc{J}\)) and efficient exploration of the search space. An effective procedure incrementally updates weights until the equality constraints are satisfied. See the Overcoming Imprecisions of Qubit Biases and Coupling Strengths section.
- Logically identical embeddings can have different higher energy spectrums, thus different performances.
- Qubits used as couplers cannot be used as problem variables, reducing the effective size of the Ising problem that can be solved. Use embeddings that waste the fewest qubits.

**Software Tools**

- See the Open-Source Software Tools section for a list of D-Wave software tools.
- The Open-Source Software Tools section references D-Wave’s open source embedding tool on GitHub.

**Further Information**

- The Embedding section discusses the above more fully.
- [Bia2016] compares global and local methods of embedding in the context of CSPs and discusses a rip-up and replace method.
- [Cai2014] gives a practical heuristic for finding graph minors.
- [Boo2016] discusses clique minor generation.
- [Ret2017] describes embedding quantum-dot cellular automata networks.
- [Jue2016] discusses using FPGA-like routing to embed.
- [Ven2015b] discusses effects of embedding the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick problem.
- [Rie2014] studies embedding and parameter setting, and their effects on problem solving in the context of optimization problems.

## Chain Management¶

The following considerations and recommendations apply to chains.

- Prefer short chains to long chains.
- Prefer uniform chain lengths to uneven chains.
- Balance chain strength and problem range. Estimate chain strength and set just slightly above the minimum threshold needed, using strategies for auto-adjusting these chains.

## Embedding Complete Graphs¶

The largest complete (all \(V\) vertices interconnected) graph \(K_V\) that is a minor of a \(M\times N\times L\) Chimera graph has \(V=1+L\min(M,N)\) vertices.

For example, 65 vertices is the theoretical maximum on a D-Wave 2000Q QPU, which supports a C16 Chimera graph (a \(16 {\rm x} 16\) matrix of 8-qubit unit cells for up to[1] \(2MNL=2 \times 16 \times 16 \times 4=2048\) qubits).

[1] | The yield of a working graph is typically less than 100%. |

Table 21 shows some example embeddings of complete graphs on a D-Wave 2000Q QPU.

Complete Graph |
Minor of Chimera Working Graph |
---|---|

\(K_5\) | \(1\times 1\times 4\) (single cell) |

\(K_9\) | \(2\times 2\times 4\) (four cells) |

\(K_{65}\) | \(16\times 16\times 4\) (all cells) |

The \(K_9\) embedded graph minor for a \(2\times2\times4\) graph is shown in Figure 51.

Specific connectivity requirements may have problem-specific embeddings that make more effective use of qubits than using Chimera as the complete graph for immediate embedding of all Ising problems defined on \(V\) variables.

**Further Information**

- The Embedding Complete Graphs section discusses embedding complete graphs in detail and provides examples.

## Finding Better Embeddings¶

Where the exact form of a problem is malleable, for example in some machine learning problems, simplify by assuming that each node in the original graph is mapped to a single node in the QPU graph. Fit the problem into the QPU by maximizing the total magnitude of \(J_{i,j}\) mapped to the Chimera or Pegasus edges; that is,

where \(\vc{M}\) is subject to the mapping constraints: \(\sum_q m_{i,q} = 1\), for all problem variables \(i\), and \(\sum_i m_{i,q}\le 1\), for all QPU nodes \(q\).

For linear time embedding, apply a greedy heuristic to approximately maximize the objective.

**Further Information**

- The Finding Better Embeddings section provides more details on the above.

## Reusing Embeddings¶

For problems that vary only the biases and weights on a fixed graph, you can set a good embedding once before submitting the problem to the QPU. There is no need to recompute the embedding (a time-consuming operation) for every submission.

## Pre-embedding Local Constraint Structures¶

The structure of some problems contains repeated elements; for example, the multiple AND gates, half adders, and full adders in the Factoring example. Such problems may benefit from being embedded with repeating block structures for the common elements, with connectivity then added as needed.

**Further Information**

- [Ada2015] describes embedding an RBM on the D-Wave system by mapping the visible nodes to chains of vertical qubits and hidden nodes to chains of horizontal qubits.

## Virtual Graphs¶

The D-Wave *virtual graph* feature provides tools and interactive examples that
simplify the process of minor-embedding by enabling you to more easily create,
optimize, use, and reuse an embedding for a given working graph. When you submit
an embedding and specify a chain strength using these tools, they automatically
calibrate the qubits in a chain to compensate for the effects of biases that may
be introduced as a result of strong couplings.

**Further Information**

- D-Wave provides an open-source tool,
`dwave_virtual_graph`

on GitHub - [Dwave6] is a white paper describing measured performance improvements from using virtual graphs.